Why Ashwin and Jadeja are not in India’s XI for 1st Test against Australia: ‘Not afraid to leave big names out’

India’s decision to exclude Ravichandran Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja from the playing XI in the first Test of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy at the Optus Stadium in Perth has raised eyebrows, given their remarkable records and proven match-winning abilities in Test cricket.

Ashwin and Jadeja’s Impressive Records

  1. Ravichandran Ashwin
    • Test wickets: 536 (second only to Anil Kumble among India’s all-time greats).
    • Batting contributions: Six Test centuries.
    • Australia-specific performance: 39 wickets in 10 Tests (second-most by an overseas spinner in Australia in the last 30 years).
    • A genuine all-rounder with a reputation for delivering in challenging conditions.
  2. Ravindra Jadeja
    • Test wickets: 319.
    • Batting average: 35 in 77 Tests, underscoring his utility as an all-rounder.
    • Australia-specific performance: 14 wickets in four Tests at an average of 21.78, making him the most effective overseas spinner (minimum 10 wickets).

The Decision

For the first Test, India opted for Washington Sundar as the lone spin-bowling all-rounder, a decision seemingly based on tactical considerations and form. Sundar’s selection suggests India’s intent to include a player who offers off-spin with the ability to hold his own with the bat, even if his experience and track record don’t match Ashwin’s or Jadeja’s.

Historical Context

The last instance of India fielding a Test XI without both Ashwin and Jadeja was during the Gabba Test in Brisbane three years ago, a match where their absence was forced due to injuries. That Test became iconic, as India clinched a historic series win against Australia. However, the current scenario is markedly different:

  • This decision is tactical, not injury-induced.
  • Ashwin and Jadeja’s stats and records heavily favor their inclusion, making their omission surprising.

Key Considerations

  1. Pitch and Conditions:
    • The Perth surface often favors pacers more than spinners, but both Ashwin and Jadeja have previously proven themselves in similar conditions.
  2. Team Balance:
    • India might have prioritized an extra pacer or Sundar’s recent form, believing his off-spin and batting to be better suited for the team composition.
  3. Strategic Experimentation:
    • The move could signal India’s willingness to experiment, potentially looking ahead to other matches in the series.

Implications

The decision to leave out Ashwin and Jadeja could be scrutinized if India’s spin department struggles or if the batting lineup lacks depth in challenging conditions. Conversely, if Sundar excels, it may validate the gamble. However, their absence undeniably leaves a void in both experience and all-round contributions.

This tactical call will be closely analyzed throughout the series, given the duo’s stature as two of India’s greatest Test match-winners in recent history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *